- Activist Feedback
- Essay: Should Churches Be Tax-Exempt? part 3
- Comments from
CVA Members
- This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
1. Activist Feedback
Rick, who leafleted at Winter Jam in
North Little Rock on February 28, writes:
I handed out 1400
CVA booklets to a receptive, young crowd. About 80% of the booklets
went to teenagers and preteens. One girl, around 14, after initially
declining a booklet, returned to me to say “I changed my heart!” and
asked me for a booklet. One adult spent some time with me to let
me know that no one was interested, while I handed out about 100
booklets. He quickly dropped the no one is interested line.
Then he asked me where I was coming from. “Good Christian
stewardship,” I replied. Then he asked if it was primarily about the
cruelty, and I replied, “Yes, primarily.” Someone else took a booklet
and then told me he got it last year. I asked what he thought of it,
and he said he is still eating meat. I replied, “Then it is good you
got another one!”
2. Essay: Should Churches Be
Tax-Exempt? part 3
In the last two weeks, I have questioned
whether religious institutions, which may silence dissent on
theological and social issues, should be tax-exempt. This week, I will
offer my own conclusions, as well as some thoughts from other CVA
members.
I have reservations about religious institutions
having tax-exempt status, because it seems to violate the separation
of church and state. The state can choose which institutions it
regards as “religious,” thereby giving advantage to religious
organizations it prefers. This does not seem to be a problem
currently, but I am always wary of governmental power, which can
easily be abused.
To the larger question about whether any
institutions should be nonprofit, I think it boils down to whether or
not they serve the public good, because nonprofit status is tantamount
to public support. Do organizations that can and often do limit free
speech within their organizations, benefit the public? I think they
do, because they often provide valuable dissenting points of view.
While the voices from the government and corporations are very loud,
giving nonprofit status to dissenting viewpoints helps to level the
playing field in the public arena.
I often find that I
disagree with dissenting views, particularly from the far left and far
right, but I think that giving them ample opportunity to express their
views broadens my horizons and serves the public good.
3.
Comments from CVA Members
I believe that the
tax-exemption on church property goes back to the time of monasteries,
when those within them had renounced all worldly activities in order
to avoid contamination by the un-Godly, so they had no money-producing
activities. So it makes sense, especially since those who had thus
renounced were considered to be in a better position to be granted, by
God, inspiration for words and works far exceeding in benefit to
society what any taxes could have provided! Yes, most "churches" don't
live up to what we believe they should in terms of spiritual purity
today. But if a bunch of CVA members, for example, decided to buy some
land and start a self-sufficient community, it would certainly be nice
if none of them had to be involved in "worldly activities" in order to
pay property taxes, (including taxes that might be used for decidedly
un-Christian purposes such as building football stadiums, or granting
tax-breaks to slaughterhouses).
Gordon Lee Stelter
While it is true that the public pays for schools (unless private) and
such, they, the public, does not pay for churches. The individuals who
go to those churches pay. Churches should be tax free as they are not
businesses and they help society to do good. The ministers and priests
and other staff of churches, all pay taxes, so there is absolutely no
need for the church as a whole to pay taxes.
Mike
4. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
Soul Searching Godliness: Living in God’s Heavenly Will