Paul Shapiro, Senior Director of Farm Animal Protection for The
Humane Society of the United States put together some of the headlines
published last week in reference to McDonald’s announcement in favor
of the phasing out of gestation crates for pigs. Here are some of
those very encouraging headlines that I believe clearly indicate that
the movement to alleviate the suffering in God’s factory farmed
animals is unstoppable and well received by consumers:
CNN Money: “McDonald's said it will get its pork suppliers to phase
out the use of immobilizing cages for pregnant pigs, a move that was
applauded by the Humane Society of the United States, but not the pork
industry.”
MSNBC: “Earthquake in the pig business: McDonald's to end use of
restraining crates."
NY Times: “The buying power of McDonald’s adds a significant new
dimension to the war on the practice.”
Chicago Sun-Times editorial board: “Now let’s ban those torture
pens for pigs in Illinois.”
NY Times blog: “In the world of big-time meat supply, there are two
kinds of producers: those who sell to McDonald’s and those wish they
could.”
Chicago Tribune: “By setting the process in motion, McDonald's
could be providing the tipping point to change in the $97 billion pork
industry.”
Lincoln Journal Star: “In calling for phasing out gestation crates
for pregnant hogs, the world's largest restaurant chain will put much
more pressure on pork producers than any state ever could.”
On the other hand, here’s an article from the factory farming
industry that clearly states that any changes regarding animal welfare
take place due to consumer pressure. This article also shows that
animal welfare is not an interest in this business.
Feedstuffs Foodlink: McDonald’s says no to gestational stalls.
Your question and comments are welcome
