The two bills legislators are considering in Massachusetts in regards
to how farmed animals should be confined, if at all, has created a
heated debate among animal welfare supporters and factory farm
supporters. The Humane Society of the United States proposes a ban on
extreme confinement of animals such as gestation and veal crates, which
to most people is just common sense. However, depicting the unethical
and uncaring views of supporters of factory farming, here is a comment
by Richard Bonanno, president of the Farm Bureau, in reference to veal
crates: “I don’t know how a calf feels about it,” ... “We put kids in
car seats and kids scream, but there is a safety factor. Is that
inhumane?”
To read the full article please visit Livestock matters in
Massachusetts: Farm Bureau, humane groups differ on proposed
legislation:
http://www.wickedlocal.com/newburyport/news/business/x1622881114/ANIMAL-WELFARE-Livestock-matters-in-Massachusetts-Farmers-humane-society-differ-on-proposed-legislation#ixzz1fcXziDPX
How is it possible that anyone defends the extreme confinement of
God’s farmed animals when it obviously causes suffering and pain? Sadly,
this is a clear example where profit trumps compassion. By supporting
these industries we are saying we approve of the egregious treatment of
sentient beings, which clearly goes against Jesus’ teachings of
compassion, mercy and love.
Your question and comments are welcome
