
1. On Science and Faith
The scientific method, which involves using observations to derive
hypotheses and then testing hypotheses with experiments, has been extremely
effective at understanding the world around us and finding ways to improve
our lives. Skepticism is crucial to scientific progress, and we should not
assume that a scientific consensus is tantamount to the truth. However, it
seems that many people, while using the products of science, such as
airplanes, computers, and medicine, selectively reject certain conclusions
about which there is a consensus among scientists. These include the finding
that humans are significantly contributing to climate change and that
vaccination does not put children at greater risk of autism. An
extraordinary claim, which in these cases is the claim that the scientific
consensus is wrong, requires extraordinary evidence. These are among the
claims for which I am convinced that there is no such extraordinary
evidence.
Religions also make extraordinary claims, and in general the evidence is
weak, at best. This is one reason that there are so many religions in the
world whose tenets irreconcilably clash with each other, even though people
with conflicting belief systems are often absolutely convinced that their
religion is the correct one. It is not, in my opinion, a virtue to be
absolutely convinced “on faith” of the truth of claims for which there is
dubious evidence. Such faith, immune to contravening evidence, can easily
lead to harm. For example, many people have interpreted the Bible as
condemning homosexuality. This has encouraged ostracism of homosexuals and
fortified the false beliefs that homosexuality is a choice, that
homosexuality can be “taught” to children, and that homosexuality can be
“cured” by conversion therapy.
Similarly, many otherwise kind and compassionate people interpret humanity’s
“dominion” over animals as license to abuse and kill them. Physicist Steven
Weinberg once said, “With or without religion, you would have good people
doing good things and evil people doing evil things. But for good people to
do evil things, that takes religion.” I would describe “religious beliefs”
more broadly as any ideology that is not well grounded in evidence and can
include relatively benign secular ideologies such as secular humanism and
malignant secular ideologies such as Nazism’s National Socialism. It has
been my impression that people tend to be better at identifying weaknesses
in logic or evidence for other religions than the one to which they adhere.
Since people tend to adopt the religion of their family or their local
community, social factors seem to play a strong role in religious
convictions. With these observations in mind, the position of agnostics and
atheists is understandable. However, I do think there is a proper and
important place for religious faith, and I will turn to that next week.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
2. All-Creatures.Org Ministry