
Happy New Year. Our e-mail guru, who sends out the e-newsletter, was out the last few weeks.
1. Original Sin part 59: Truth, part 3
In the previous installment, I discussed how “the myth of whiteness” has resulted in misunderstandings about human nature and the source of evil. The result has been injustice and divisiveness that has plagued America since its inception.
Is there an analogy when it comes to animal issues? I’m convinced that the answer is yes. Those humans who participate in the harmful exploitation expose themselves to a dilemma. They can either acknowledge that their behavior is reprehensible, or they can try to legitimize animal abuse by devising scientifically dubious theories about the nature of humans and nonhumans. Nearly all humans have chosen the second option, which comes at a great price.
The second option requires that people identify features that make humans
distinct from nonhumans. This isn’t easy, since evolutionary science has
left little doubt that humans are animals whose distinctive traits that have
conferred, at least for the time being, survival benefit. Science has shown
that humans differ from other animals in degree, but not in kind. Other
animals have demonstrated intelligent behavior, communication skills that
can best be defined as language (though humans keep changing the definition
of “language” when nonhumans pass our linguistic “tests”), altruistic
behavior, and the full range of emotions that humans exhibit. Indeed, some
humans with disabilities perform worse on human-created intelligence tests
than some animals. And, some animals appear to
be superior to humans in certain cognitive skills, as discussed in Frans De
Waals’ book, Are We Smart Enough to Know How Smart Animals Are?
Defending human domination has involved misapprehending the mental and emotional attributes of nonhuman animals. It also requires that humans misunderstand their own nature. I will discuss the grave consequences next.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
2. All-Creatures.Org Ministry