
1. Activist Feedback
This weekend Victoria and I leafleted at a Newsboys concert in Cleveland,
distributing 600 Joyful, Compassionate Eating booklets. It was Victoria’s
first time, and she did a great job. She greeted people enthusiastically and
commenting warmly on their clothing or she commiserated with them on the
cold weather. Our reception rate was very high. - Steve
To learn about outreach opportunities in your area contact Lorena at
lorenavalenziveg@gmail.com.
2. On Humanism
Though people of faith and secularists often find themselves in conflict,
historically secular and religious thought have influenced each other. A
core tenet of secular humanism – that all people have intrinsic value –
seems to accord with the Bible’s description of Jesus’ teachings. I do not
think this is a coincidence. Humanistic elements of the widely influential
Judeo-Christian tradition laid the groundwork for the development of secular
humanism.
Admirably, secular humanism affirms the dignity and value of all people.
However, it fails as a comprehensive, cohesive ethic to the degree that it
ignores the needs and rights of nonhumans. Indeed, most secular humanists
vigorously champion the rights of members of ethnic, LGBT, and other
vulnerable human minorities, yet the vast majority continues to endorse and
even sponsor the extreme abuse and murder of nonhuman beings.
How can this be? I suspect that an underlying, infrequently articulated
assumption of humanism is that humans are exceptional creatures. Most
humanists believe in evolutionary theory, which sees Homo sapiens as simply
one species among many. Yet, in what appears to be a contradictory stance,
humanists generally regard humans as much more valuable, perhaps infinitely
more valuable, than other creatures. While humanists tend to reject white
supremacy, male supremacy, and the like, they cling to the convenient and
self-serving tenet of human supremacy, which permits massive abuse of
nonhumans for food, skins, entertainment, research, and other supposed human
benefits.
In addition to supporting crimes of great magnitude against by nonhumans,
this view is problematic for humanists themselves. Humanists defend human
rights on the grounds that people the world over are very similar, so there
are no legitimate grounds for excluding humans from equal moral
consideration. While they employ science to make this claim, science also
shows that humans and many kinds of nonhumans are fundamentally very
similar. If humanists lift up science only when it suits their particular
concerns and ignore science when it yields inconvenient truths, they
undermine the moral and intellectual grounds upon which humanism is based.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
3. The April Issue of “The Peaceable Table” Is Now Online
Contents include:
To access this issue, see
www.vegetarianfriends.net/issue123.html. To discuss any of its
material with other readers, go to
www.vegetarianfriends.net/forum.
Toward the Peaceable Kingdom,
Gracia Fay Ellwood, Editor
3.
This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
God Forgives Truly Repentant People