
1. Activist Feedback
Carol, who tabled with Anna and Seth at the Houston VegFest, writes:
Vegfest went great. We had a table in a good location. We had many
interested people (easy crowd) and many people signed up for CVA membership.
We depleted our supplies about the time that the Vegfest ended. Anna and
Seth were great CVA ambassadors and my hope is that they will
participate/leaflet again soon.
All of the many booklets and leaflets were great and there was particular
interest in Fr. John Dear's leaflet this year because many people were
pacifists too. Again, everything went very well overall and it was good to
reach so many people in a comfortable educational setting.
2. Peacemaking part 3: A Proposal to Ensure Good Motives
We humans tend to be excellent observers, but we are not always good
interpreters. In particular, we often err badly when trying to assess
motivations, including our own motivations. We tend to attribute bad motives
to those with whom we disagree and good motives to those with whom we agree,
and the latter group almost always includes ourselves.
Last week, I argued that use of force to defend ourselves or others is
sometimes justifiable. However, it can be difficult to discern whether this
use of force is genuinely aimed to protect the innocent. Perhaps “defense”
is just an excuse for force designed to gain money, power, or prestige. How
can we be sure that our motives are good?
I suggest that whenever force is used, compensation for the victims of force
should be planned and then executed, to the best of one’s ability.
Compensation can take various forms, including financial (perhaps with
amounts being guided by precedents in court cases for accident victims) and
social (e.g., attending to the social and emotional needs of the victim
and/or victim’s relatives). If we knew that we would be held accountable for
any harm that we perpetrated against another, however justified we might
believe this harm might be, we would use force sparingly.
Of course, with this principle, violence toward nonhuman persons should be
exceedingly rare. Yet, humans are remarkable in their ability to believe one
thing and to do another. As best I can tell, the vast majority of peace
activists eat meat and other animal products. This strikes me as
hypocritical.
Next week, I’ll start to explore the nature and implications of hypocrisy.
Stephen R. Kaufman, MD
3. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
Narrow Heavenly Path: Are We On It?