
1. Dangers of Social Media
It seems that today many people have markedly different versions of
reality. For many people, their version of “the truth” seems so obvious that
those with whom they disagree must be arguing in bad faith. Without a common
understanding of basic facts and with a conviction that “their” opponents
are evil, we have become highly polarized. It seems that this condition is a
grave threat to any effort to address the social, political economic, and
environmental challenges of our day. How did this happen?
As described in the documentary The Social Dilemma, competition between
rival social networks has favored whatever algorithms keep people on a given
social network’s site. The money is in connecting people to advertisers.
However, those algorithms do not respect truth or societal well-being. If an
algorithm determines that a person who believes one unfounded conspiracy
hypothesis is likely to stay on site by clicking an article about another,
equally unsubstantiated conspiracy hypothesis, the second site will be
highlighted. The algorithms refine the recommendations continuously,
starting with the general demographics of a user and then modifying
recommendations according to the actual “clicks” of individual users. The
social networks even incorporate data from users’ web site visits, “likes,”
and e-mails.
Because outrage tends to generate views and clicks, people are offered
increasingly outrageous material, as long as they “take the bait.” It does
not matter if the news stories, web sites, etc. are truthful. Meanwhile
advertisers know that intellectually engaged viewers more less likely to
doubt their contrived messages, so they have the social network offerings
encourage viewers to go to sites that dull critical thinking.
We are rapidly approaching a time when computer programs powered by
artificial intelligence understand our minds better than we do. Clever
algorithms can even entice good-hearted people to make hard-hearted choices
when it comes to humans and nonhumans. I will continue to explore the
dangers next week, but I do think there are ways that our faith can help us
resist the threats.
Stephen R. Kaufman, MD
2. Food for Thought
The time of COVID-19 lock-downs and social distancing has been hard for
many of us, but it could also be a gift in that it has given us as a chance
for reflection. As the Sabbath rest involves spiritual study and reflection,
we can this period to consider how to make our lives more peaceful,
healthier, and less harmful to God’s creatures. In doing so, we might also
significantly reduced risk of future pandemic illnesses.
The CDC has found that most known and emerging diseases come from animals.1.
These include swine flu, avian flu, poxes, and plague; and there is evidence
linking COVID-19 to a Chinese wet market. In many cases, these diseases
originated from human contact with farmed or otherwise harmfully exploited
animals.
We treat animals so dismally that theologian William Ralph Inge observed,
“We have enslaved the rest of the animal creation, and have treated our
distant cousins in fur and feathers so badly that beyond doubt, if they were
able to formulate a religion, they would depict the Devil in human form.”
Why do people do this?
During the lockdown I have had a lot of time to reflect upon possible
answers. I think Numbers 11 (and the corresponding passages of Psalms 78 and
106 and Paul’s mention of this event in 1 Corinthians 10) is very apt for
the situation we are experiencing. God provided all the food the Israelites
needed for their testing in the desert. Instead of being satisfied, they
“lusted” to eat animal flesh. God reluctantly gave into their demands, but
punished them for it by bringing a plague upon those who ate the flesh. If
God punishes evil, will not God punish humanity for its devilish treatment
of animals? Perhaps COVID-19 and other pandemics is a kind of divine
retribution.
Pandemics are not the only health consequences of eating animals. Humans are
not designed to consume flesh,2. and many major health problems are related
to eating animals, including cardiovascular disease, obesity, and many kinds
of cancer. Further, the massive use of antibiotics needed to keep highly
stressed farmed animals alive promotes antibiotic resistance among bacteria,
further endangering human health.
This lust has a host of negative consequences. Feeding grains to farmed
animals rather than people contributes to world hunger. Flesh has a much
higher environmental impact than plant foods. And, we should not forget
slaughterhouse workers, who have very high injury rates doing bloody,
violent, soul-destroying work.
If we want to live in the peace God promises us in Isaiah (or in any number
of other sacred texts) – where the wolf will lay down with the lamb and all
will live peacefully together – we need commit ourselves to peace, justice,
and mercy for all of creatures of the world. During this time of reflection,
and as society gets back to “normal,” we should reflect upon our actions.
Perhaps we should start with the simple question: ‘When I eat do I do so
mercifully and peacefully?’
By Chris Grant
3. All-Creatures.org Ministry
Newsletters: These are recent editions of our all-creatures Newsletter, which we hope you like and share with others to help end the exploitation and killing of animals:
Recipes:
Sermons: