1. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
Bread of Life for Everyone
2. Thoughts on Free Will, part 5
Does having a “soul” endow humans with free will? This is a difficult
question to address, in part because the exact nature of the “soul” is
unclear. Is it a physical entity? If that is that case, we run into the
problem, which I discussed earlier. Having free will means that one could
have acted differently if one had chosen to act differently. How can a
physical soul, which presumably should abide by the laws of physics as
physical entities normally do, have had the ability to choose differently
from the way it had chosen?
Is the soul a nonphysical entity? Many people envision the soul as such,
which likely relates to the idea that the soul exists after the body dies
and decomposes. A difficulty with this theory, as it relates to the question
of free will, is that it is unclear how a nonphysical entity (the soul) can
force a physical entity (the human body) to do something. This is the “ghost
in the machine” problem that critics have leveled against Descartes’
mind-body dualism.
Yet, people tend to cling to the notion of free will, in part because they
feel free to make their own decisions. Next, I will discuss why I think this
commonplace notion should be taken seriously, even if it is difficult to
identify the mechanism by which we might have free will.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
See more Reflections on the Lectionary (Series)