1. CVA Video on the
Internet
2. Chicks Used for Packing Filler
3.
Essay: Are
Humans Superior?
4. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary
Hoffman
1. CVA Video on the Internet
The CVA’s 26 minute video,
designed for use at Christian Education classes with the accompanying
study guide, as now available online at:
https://christianveg.org/cvavideo.htm
2. Chicks
Used for Packing Filler
In yet another example of the heartlessness
of animal agribusiness, male chicks are being used as filler to keep
the birds who are ordered warm. Obviously, many of the male chicks die
en route, and once they arrive they have no use and are generally
killed. If we are to make any claim to be people of God, who must
vigorously oppose this and the many other routine abuses of many
billions of animals each year.
Baby Chicks Used as Packing Filler:
http://www.psychologytoday.com/blog/animal-emotions/201204/baby-chicks-used-packing-filler
3. Essay: Are Humans Superior?
Many people defend animal abuse
on the grounds that humans are superior to nonhumans. What makes
animal-abusing humans superior? It can’t be human capacity for moral
behavior, because it makes no sense to claim that having moral
capabilities justifies immoral behavior. It can’t be intelligence.
While intelligence gives humans the potential to be superior
creatures, if that intelligence is used to abuse innocent, vulnerable
individuals, then human intelligence is a curse for the rest of the
world, not a sign of human superiority. Also, some humans, including
those with mental disabilities, have inferior intelligence compared to
nonhumans, yet we don’t support experimenting on or eating these
humans.
I don’t think humans having a soul justifies abusive
tyranny over animals, since 1) I find no scientific evidence for a
soul (and it would be inappropriate to justify mistreatment of
innocent individuals without solid grounds for doing so, and
non-empirical grounds such as faith can be used to justify any kind of
abuse); 2) given the overwhelming scientific evidence that humans are
animals, it makes little sense to assert that humans have souls while
nonhumans do not; and 3) there is a strong Biblical foundation for
claiming that nonhumans have souls (see Guided by the Faith of Christ
p. 123).
Even if humans were superior to nonhumans, such
superiority would not justify mistreatment of nonhumans. Similarly,
not all humans have the same capabilities, and the superiority of some
humans over others does not permit abusive treatment. As philosopher
Tom Regan observed, if an alien race overwhelmed humanity, and if it
were superior to humans in any feature that we regard as morally
relevant, such as intelligence, would this alien race be equally
justified in experimenting on and eating us as most humans think they
are justified in doing these things to nonhumans? In my view, the
possibility that there is no firm ground to assert human superiority
makes the ethical grounds for treating nonhumans with justice and
compassion that much stronger.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
4.
This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
Is Godly Love the True Spirit of Christmas?