- Upcoming Activist
Opportunities
- Essay: Do analogies to the Holocaust demean
Holocaust victims?
- This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and
Mary Hoffman
- Note about The Hobbit
1. Upcoming Activist
Opportunities
1/25
TXAmarillo
Third Day Christian Rock Concert
1/25
MO Kansas City
Winter Jam Christian Concert
1/26
IA Des Moines
Winter Jam Christian Concert
1/27
IL Peoria
Winter Jam Christian Concert
1/30
IN Evansville Winter Jam
Christian Concert
2/1
WI Milwaukee
Winter Jam
2/2
KY Louisville Winter Jam
2/7
NC Fayetteville
Winter Jam
2/21
VA Fairfax
Third Day Christian Rock Concert
5/19
CA Lake Balboa
TABLE WorldFest 2013 Earth Day Festival
Contact Paris at
christian_vegetarian@yahoo.com if you can help. To find out about
all upcoming leafleting and tabling opportunities in your area, join
the CVA Calendar Group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christian_vegetarian/
2.
Essay: Do analogies to the Holocaust demean Holocaust victims?
I think the answer is yes only if we regard animals as unworthy of
moral consideration. However, all humans and “higher” animals can
experience pleasure and pain, and all have a similar desire to live
and thrive. Reflecting the commonality between human and nonhuman
beings, the Bible offers ample support for regarding animals as moral
subjects. Genesis 1 describes God blessing all animals and declaring
them “good.” Repeatedly, God expresses concern for nonhumans. Among
the many examples, after the Flood, God makes a covenant with Noah
“and every living creature” not to flood the earth again, and one
reason God saves Nineveh is to spare the many cattle there (Jonah
4:11).
Are the lives of humans and nonhumans equally
valuable? Naturally, we will tend value the lives of individuals who
are more like us and with whom we have closer bonds. Indeed, most of
us value the lives of family members far above the lives of other
humans. This bias, while understandable and perhaps even desirable in
many ways, does not excuse callous disregard for those individuals
with whom we lack emotional attachments. It is ironic that animal
advocates are often criticized for being sentimental, yet they are the
ones who generally transcend sentimentalism and abide by principles of
justice.
There are different ways to assess the value of life,
and I don’t think there are any objective standards to ascertain which
way(s) are most legitimate. The lives of nonhumans matter to them, and
for the more social creatures such as dogs and cats, the lives of
companions matter to each other. I see no legitimate grounds for
disregarding the lives of nonhumans, and it seems that the principle
reason most people disregard nonhuman lives is that doing so is
convenient and self-serving. Here is perhaps the greatest irony. Many
people had little regard for the lives of Nazis because the Nazis
justified callous, violent, and immoral behavior on the groundless
claim that their victims were inferior. These same people generally
believe that other-than-Nazi human lives are extremely valuable. Yet,
these other-than-Nazi humans justify their own callous, violent, and
immoral treatment of nonhumans on the dubious grounds that the
supposed inferiority of nonhumans permits abusive treatment.
What, if anything, makes humans superior? I will explore this question
next week.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D
3. This
Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary Hoffman
Is The True Spirit Of Christmas Still With You?
4.
Note about The Hobbit
Last week’s e-newsletter mentioned The
Peaceable Table, the contents of which included a review of The
Hobbit, with a favorable comment about the human/nonhuman
relationships depicted in the movie. However, one CVA member noted a
recent report than many animals died while the movie was being made on
account of poor facilities.
For more information, read
27 Animals Killed During “The Hobbit”
and see:
http://forcechange.com/43390/film-director-peter-jackson-must-stop-using-live-animals-on-set-after-27-perish/.