1. Activist Feedback
2. Book Notice: Call to Compassion: Religious
Perspectives on Animal Advocacy
3. Christianity and Animal Rights, part 5
4. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary
Hoffman
1. Activist Feedback
Rick Hershey, who leafleted at Winter Jam in St. Louis on April 1,
writes:
Susan and I leafleted this event. She handed out 135 and I handed out
650 for a total of 785 booklets to mostly receptive teens and preteens.
I think that we had a productive evening.
Contact Paris at
christian_vegetarian@yahoo.com if you can
help. To find out about all upcoming leafleting and tabling
opportunities in your area, join the CVA Calendar Group at
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/christian_vegetarian/
2. Book Notice:
Call to Compassion: Religious
Perspectives on Animal Advocacy, edited by Lisa Kemmerer
and Anthony J. Nocella II, Lantern Books, 2011, 303 pp, $40.
This collection of essays looks at animal issues from a broad range
of Eastern and Western religious perspectives. Chapters that might be of
greatest interest to Christians include one on Christian mysticism by
Andrew Fitz-Gibbon, “A Society of Friends View” by CVA member Gracia Fay
Bouwman Ellwood, and “Christianity and Scapegoating: Understanding and
Responding to Oppression” by me. As a contributor, for a limited time I
can purchase copies at a reduced rate. For more information, contact me
at
cva@christianveg.org .
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
3. Christianity and Animal Rights, part 5
Previous essays have argued that secular knowledge invariably
influences how we interpret the Bible. The notion of rights – which are
central to contemporary conversations about justice – is not found in
the Bible. Human rights, environmental rights, animal rights, and other
rights are secular concepts. I think that rights are crucial for
applying the ancient, biblical principles of justice in our contemporary
society.
In our pluralist, secular society, justice is meted out by judges,
guided by laws rather than by religious authorities guided by their
interpretations of religious texts. In secular societies, rights
codified by laws are essential for protecting the weak against strong.
Without laws to protect rights, basic rights such as freedom of
religion, freedom of speech, the right to a fair trial, and protection
against the whims of powerful individuals or institutions would be in
great peril. For example, without rights, a majority of people of a
certain religion could force minorities to abide by their faith.
Similarly, those with power could silence those with whom they disagree,
sometimes silencing the truth.
One might argue against rights in favor of majority rule. For
example, if the majority wishes to criminalize belonging to a certain
religion or political party, that is “the will of the people.” I see at
least four fundamental problems with majority rule trumping individual
rights. First, with majority rule, the whim of the majority could
overrule essential needs of a minority. For example, if the majority
wished to enslave a minority, the modest benefits to the majority would
likely pale compared to the substantial suffering of the minority.
Second, it is difficult to enfranchise everyone, such as children,
people who are mentally impaired, or nonhuman beings, who have a strong
interest in social justice issues but who don’t understand the issues at
hand. In majority rule, those without a vote often don’t count, and
indeed when it comes to animal issues, a minority of humans has
“out-voted” a far greater number of non-humans. Third, in a large
society, such as the United States with over 300 million people, it is
logistically difficult to make policy decisions democratically. Instead,
we have a representative democracy, but elected officials often have
their own personal agendas that could easily lead to injustice and
abuse.
A fourth reason that rights are essential is that humans are mimetic
creatures, as I’ve discussed in past essays. Because people tend to be
heavily influenced by the attitudes and convictions of other people, an
irrational consensus can readily develop. This makes the general
populace prone to error, particularly when emotions are aroused. Rights
help protect weak and vulnerable individuals against the passions of the
crowd. Further, we need unpopular prophets who speak truth during times
of confusion, and without these prophets injustice more readily
flourishes. In many respects, those of us who decry animal abuse are
prophets speaking truth to power, and without freedom of speech the
cause for animals would be nearly hopeless.
Protected animal rights with laws is an effective way to apply the
biblical principles in our secular, pluralistic society. Next week, I
will elaborate on my claim that animals need rights in order to receive
meaningful protection against abuse.
Stephen R. Kaufman, M.D.
4. This Week’s Sermon from Rev. Frank and Mary
Hoffman
Am I Able to Drink His Cup
http://www.all-creatures.org/sermons97/s27mar88.html .